<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Weeks of Classes</title>
	<link>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/</link>
	<description>it's not slanted; it's the truth</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4411</link>
		<author>Catherine</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4411</guid>
					<description>OMG robotics!  Please do take pictures of the stuff you make!  Yea... I'm not sure that my lectures are going to be as good here, but I've only had one day of class so far, so we'll see (plus, I'm taking everything over again... ^^;;).  Sounds like you're having awesome fun though.  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG robotics!  Please do take pictures of the stuff you make!  Yea&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure that my lectures are going to be as good here, but I&#8217;ve only had one day of class so far, so we&#8217;ll see (plus, I&#8217;m taking everything over again&#8230; ^^;;).  Sounds like you&#8217;re having awesome fun though.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praeceptrix</title>
		<link>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4501</link>
		<author>praeceptrix</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4501</guid>
					<description>loved the invalid proof list.  I have stolen it for future reference.  BTY MLK A and MLKB have both already qualified for NAQT at a tournament in Alabama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved the invalid proof list.  I have stolen it for future reference.  BTY MLK A and MLKB have both already qualified for NAQT at a tournament in Alabama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkajit</title>
		<link>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4535</link>
		<author>Arkajit</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ebroder.net/2006/09/21/two-weeks-of-classes/#comment-4535</guid>
					<description>Hey Evan,

     I ran across this entry when I followed your link back from the MIT Blogs site. I just had to say that I found the list of bad proof techniques absolutely hilarious. I was bawling on each one. I particularly enjoyed the proof by accumulated evidence; if only that were true, the Riemann Hypothesis would be solved! Also the technique of labelling a proof "trivial" also resonated with me. Alas, too many textbooks still employ this technique to cut down on length.

- Arkajit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Evan,</p>
<p>     I ran across this entry when I followed your link back from the <acronym title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym> Blogs site. I just had to say that I found the list of bad proof techniques absolutely hilarious. I was bawling on each one. I particularly enjoyed the proof by accumulated evidence; if only that were true, the Riemann Hypothesis would be solved! Also the technique of labelling a proof &#8220;trivial&#8221; also resonated with me. Alas, too many textbooks still employ this technique to cut down on length.</p>
<p>- Arkajit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
