Two Weeks of Classes
September 21st, 2006 @ 8:42 pm UTC by evanSo, it’s been two weeks since that first day, and it seems only fair to provide an update on just what’s going on:
My score on the FEE required that I take a CI-HW class sometime in the first year. Unfortunately, some massive percentage of the freshman class received the same score, and there is only capacity for about 306 students to take a CI-HW class per semester. Long story short, I couldn’t get into a section that fit my schedule, so I dropped the class, and I’ll take it next semester.
Instead, I’m taking
The class looks like it’s going to be good. I’m told that they played a clip from The Colbert Report on the first day of class, but since I joined we’ve received a hilarious list of invalid proof techniques and watched a clip from Die Hard 3.
The problem sets are hard, but my TA is very helpful. I actually just got back from office hours where a couple of us and my TA worked through about 60% of the p-set.
As for other classes,
The work load has been pretty light—a relatively p-set every two weeks, although the TAs don’t seem to be quite as good.
Incidentally, it’s worth pointing out that 10-250, the largest lecture hall on campus, only has 425 seats. On some days, there are people sitting in the aisles, but videos of the lectures are also put online, which is great when you can’t remember some aspect of the lecture.
My recitation leader for
Homework for
My last full fledged class is
In theory, TEAL is a departure from the traditional lecture and recitation format of college classes. It encourages collaboration, working in small groups, better knowledge retention, and all kinds of good things like that.
In reality, it’s an example of how too much technology can be a bad solution. Classes generally consist of a professor lecturing off of a Powerpoint with intermittent interruptions for 5 or 10 minutes of group work at a time.
Many people agree that it works very poorly, and my advisor wants me and my friends to try and figure out why so that he can go complain and try to fix it.
Speaking of my advisor, that brings us to my advising seminar,
The class will involve some basic electronics work, but after that, it’s basically free-form; we come in with ideas of what we want to build, and Ed (the instructor) provides us with the materials and a little of the information. Right now we just finished building mobile robots controlled by a PIC, and we have to work on the programming aspect, which will probably be more challenging than the building.
In any case, it’s a great stress relief class, and even though I think we get a lot done, it doesn’t feel so much like work because it’s so free-form. In fact, I’ve actually stayed around working on various things for an hour after class both Monday and yesterday.
Outside of classes, I haven’t gotten involved in any activities yet, but that’s mostly because I’m still club shopping. Friends have recommended that I get involved with the FIRST Robotics team here, which should be good because I think it’s based at the Edgerton Center (which is where my seminar is). Other than that I’m still looking.
So, that’s life. Oh—also, my roommate and I are going to sign up to host visiting pre-frosh. So if anyone that reads this is interested in Course VI (specifically, the computer science aspects of it) or Course II, Kris and I don’t have any real experience in our respective fields, but we’d be glad to host you anyway.
Tags: college
OMG robotics! Please do take pictures of the stuff you make! Yea… I’m not sure that my lectures are going to be as good here, but I’ve only had one day of class so far, so we’ll see (plus, I’m taking everything over again… ^^;;). Sounds like you’re having awesome fun though. =)
loved the invalid proof list. I have stolen it for future reference. BTY MLK A and MLKB have both already qualified for NAQT at a tournament in Alabama.
Hey Evan,
I ran across this entry when I followed your link back from the MIT Blogs site. I just had to say that I found the list of bad proof techniques absolutely hilarious. I was bawling on each one. I particularly enjoyed the proof by accumulated evidence; if only that were true, the Riemann Hypothesis would be solved! Also the technique of labelling a proof “trivial” also resonated with me. Alas, too many textbooks still employ this technique to cut down on length.
- Arkajit